Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-04 11:15:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 83142D95A9EB2547942E2F4D5C55AD0836C9119FEB842CA5E3F981D7C336988D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ao contrário do tweet, o atestado tinha sido negado pelo fato de estar de férias, não pela vacina. Não houve nenhuma condenação por indenização, também ao contrário do dito. Somente houve uma condenação em custas e honorários, além da permissão de poder trabalhar sem vacina. https://esaj.tjsp.jus.br/cpopg/show.do?processo.codigo=1Z000H3FH0000&processo.foro=71&processo.numero=1005010-23.2022.8.26.0071

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1654068043708768256
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 83142D95A9EB2547942E2F4D5C55AD0836C9119FEB842CA5E3F981D7C336988D
  • createdAtMillis - 1683198937530
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165406804370876825683142D95A9EB2547942E2F4D5C55AD0836C9119FEB842CA5E3F981D7C336988D