Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-18 00:06:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 44CFF41B20833AE1E218F10AAB45D230E8F02382837E9BFC9A64A118B117BD3D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ao contrário do tweet, o atestado tinha sido negado pelo fato de estar de férias, não pela vacina. Não houve nenhuma condenação por indenização, também ao contrário do dito. Somente houve uma condenação em custas e honorários, além da permissão de poder trabalhar sem vacina. https://esaj.tjsp.jus.br/cpopg/show.do?processo.codigo=1Z000H3FH0000&processo.foro=71&processo.numero=1005010-23.2022.8.26.0071

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1654068043708768256
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 44CFF41B20833AE1E218F10AAB45D230E8F02382837E9BFC9A64A118B117BD3D
  • createdAtMillis - 1684368408675
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165406804370876825644CFF41B20833AE1E218F10AAB45D230E8F02382837E9BFC9A64A118B117BD3D