Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-04 10:10:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F422785E1E1AD8CDF5EA27F7A8520B559CA5E95E88EF56AE8D25D3657C77D8AF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet itself does not say any of the things that other attempted community notes are complaining about. Those things are in the linked article, not the tweet. The tweet itself 'just' has personal (OK, corporate since it is NYT tweeting) opinion about Carlson. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653827103547072519
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F422785E1E1AD8CDF5EA27F7A8520B559CA5E95E88EF56AE8D25D3657C77D8AF
  • createdAtMillis - 1683195014126
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1653827103547072519F422785E1E1AD8CDF5EA27F7A8520B559CA5E95E88EF56AE8D25D3657C77D8AF