Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-04 07:59:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DB16165AA6F529B09C9807C1B4BCF084599D6A8D45B6A009F3B848057A7059CB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet itself does not say any of the things that other attempted community notes are complaining about. Those things are in the linked article, not the tweet. The tweet itself 'just' has personal (OK, corporate since it is NYT tweeting) opinion about Carlson. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653827103547072519
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DB16165AA6F529B09C9807C1B4BCF084599D6A8D45B6A009F3B848057A7059CB
  • createdAtMillis - 1683187162859
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1653827103547072519DB16165AA6F529B09C9807C1B4BCF084599D6A8D45B6A009F3B848057A7059CB