Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-04 08:59:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AA3F9EEA14CD5A2BD3390A82E84B1CE79D0AB7E2C9C941E9FFC814E00E4850C5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet itself does not say any of the things that other attempted community notes are complaining about. Those things are in the linked article, not the tweet. The tweet itself 'just' has personal (OK, corporate since it is NYT tweeting) opinion about Carlson. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653827103547072519
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AA3F9EEA14CD5A2BD3390A82E84B1CE79D0AB7E2C9C941E9FFC814E00E4850C5
  • createdAtMillis - 1683190742206
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1653827103547072519AA3F9EEA14CD5A2BD3390A82E84B1CE79D0AB7E2C9C941E9FFC814E00E4850C5