Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-04 07:59:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 82D72B1D9D89A92C07D7999338B8A76CCBC7A4DEF968B9B7E44B4751F130895D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet itself does not say any of the things that other attempted community notes are complaining about. Those things are in the linked article, not the tweet. The tweet itself 'just' has personal (OK, corporate since it is NYT tweeting) opinion about Carlson. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653827103547072519
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 82D72B1D9D89A92C07D7999338B8A76CCBC7A4DEF968B9B7E44B4751F130895D
  • createdAtMillis - 1683187162859
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165382710354707251982D72B1D9D89A92C07D7999338B8A76CCBC7A4DEF968B9B7E44B4751F130895D