Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-04 00:46:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 07B44C72A0E3E24081968FD3FE78A16C17C4ECB2FF45CC85F8280235CFE8B5E1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet itself does not say any of the things that other attempted community notes are complaining about. Those things are in the linked article, not the tweet. The tweet itself 'just' has personal (OK, corporate since it is NYT tweeting) opinion about Carlson. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653827103547072519
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 07B44C72A0E3E24081968FD3FE78A16C17C4ECB2FF45CC85F8280235CFE8B5E1
  • createdAtMillis - 1683161180074
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165382710354707251907B44C72A0E3E24081968FD3FE78A16C17C4ECB2FF45CC85F8280235CFE8B5E1