Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-03 14:45:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5ED63A3F6807988DD6779F133AAF8438F3695F787EA95CECC36A7A9EF4AE3435
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed, the article explains the story and how the woman didn't claim replacement ID.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653678254048329729
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5ED63A3F6807988DD6779F133AAF8438F3695F787EA95CECC36A7A9EF4AE3435
  • createdAtMillis - 1683125111060
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16536782540483297295ED63A3F6807988DD6779F133AAF8438F3695F787EA95CECC36A7A9EF4AE3435