Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-23 10:50:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0223E311DD0FC82401671D5292A02ADA457BF6F437C04F01F637969D2FB8DE2E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The cited reports by Charol Shakeshaft were criticised for 'seriously flawed' methodology: https://www.independent.org/news/article.asp?id=1331 The report states "The views expressed herein are those of the authors. No official endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education is intended or should be inferred" (p3) https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/misconductreview/report.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653598805374402560
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0223E311DD0FC82401671D5292A02ADA457BF6F437C04F01F637969D2FB8DE2E
  • createdAtMillis - 1716461430604
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16535988053744025600223E311DD0FC82401671D5292A02ADA457BF6F437C04F01F637969D2FB8DE2E