Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-03 02:50:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B0FFB4D99C08A78F7A5D5CEEFE5F703D963A8586A8E8BB6A614C1B7998F0D6B0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet author is expressing personal opinion and feelings about not being reinstated. Opposing arguments and opinions on if/why it was justified should go in the replies, not community notes. Note not needed for this. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653590500405018624
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B0FFB4D99C08A78F7A5D5CEEFE5F703D963A8586A8E8BB6A614C1B7998F0D6B0
  • createdAtMillis - 1683082240184
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1653590500405018624B0FFB4D99C08A78F7A5D5CEEFE5F703D963A8586A8E8BB6A614C1B7998F0D6B0