Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-03 12:31:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7087E95487E4F49E9FE3EF2308E4E4C539279C891CE4980F97832BC1B9A1F35D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet author is expressing personal opinion and feelings about not being reinstated. Opposing arguments and opinions on if/why it was justified should go in the replies, not community notes. Note not needed for this. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653590500405018624
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7087E95487E4F49E9FE3EF2308E4E4C539279C891CE4980F97832BC1B9A1F35D
  • createdAtMillis - 1683117085063
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16535905004050186247087E95487E4F49E9FE3EF2308E4E4C539279C891CE4980F97832BC1B9A1F35D