Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-03 03:22:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1757CFE187DA2FDC04360150C64985F3EC7C368308F16CBEC7F5D88E07B4BA28
Participant Details

Original Note:

É falso que o Google impulsionou ou burlou termos de uso para beneficiar informação sobre a PL2630 Em nota a empresa disse: "É importante ressaltar que nunca alteramos manualmente as listas de resultados para favorecer a posição de uma página de web específica" Nota Competa: https://revistaoeste.com/politica/google-se-manifesta-depois-de-decisao-de-moraes/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653568251262017536
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1757CFE187DA2FDC04360150C64985F3EC7C368308F16CBEC7F5D88E07B4BA28
  • createdAtMillis - 1683084148656
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16535682512620175361757CFE187DA2FDC04360150C64985F3EC7C368308F16CBEC7F5D88E07B4BA28