Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-03 12:06:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 60907B7A597BA96A19763E4574C4C05F5350A2F7F6AE3A319F6D8B6A6FA2BF1E
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet is correctly describing what people have speculated about. Note not needed, particularly to describe the credibility issues of a specific lawsuit that wasn't even mentioned in this tweet. The reply functionality exists for that.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653531695923208192
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 60907B7A597BA96A19763E4574C4C05F5350A2F7F6AE3A319F6D8B6A6FA2BF1E
  • createdAtMillis - 1683115590350
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165353169592320819260907B7A597BA96A19763E4574C4C05F5350A2F7F6AE3A319F6D8B6A6FA2BF1E