Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-03 02:31:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FDE4C5F5B12C09236F809D4AF2BD9908282C5DBCAA9D42A73A63C5EBD801302E
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet expresses a personal opinion- there is no need for the note on this one. I'd even argue it's abusing the CN system at this point, and is being used as an attac against the account, rather than correcting a statement.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653433731766702081
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FDE4C5F5B12C09236F809D4AF2BD9908282C5DBCAA9D42A73A63C5EBD801302E
  • createdAtMillis - 1683081119265
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1653433731766702081FDE4C5F5B12C09236F809D4AF2BD9908282C5DBCAA9D42A73A63C5EBD801302E