Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-03 02:59:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C50CB1D00D23751D671D7E34551BD3B8C2682E866AA871E5C65858E68CCB1E24
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet expresses a personal opinion- there is no need for the note on this one. I'd even argue it's abusing the CN system at this point, and is being used as an attac against the account, rather than correcting a statement.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653433731766702081
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C50CB1D00D23751D671D7E34551BD3B8C2682E866AA871E5C65858E68CCB1E24
  • createdAtMillis - 1683082797515
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1653433731766702081C50CB1D00D23751D671D7E34551BD3B8C2682E866AA871E5C65858E68CCB1E24