Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-02 23:01:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EDE913D5426B0A81A58131E05C6917A55A9CD9F2B83453788D0C6B12F9B0E941
Participant Details

Original Note:

I support the proposed note and am replying to the comment about why NNN. If the bill states "gender transition procedures" and the article, and the tweet, use "gender affirming care" these are two different things. There is "gender affirming care" that is not banned.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653433525075423232
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EDE913D5426B0A81A58131E05C6917A55A9CD9F2B83453788D0C6B12F9B0E941
  • createdAtMillis - 1683068479871
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1653433525075423232EDE913D5426B0A81A58131E05C6917A55A9CD9F2B83453788D0C6B12F9B0E941