Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-02 23:31:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ADD6D84E1F57E6163E655F2B417E4696E606ADB54DD1EDE679CED0D4F3222ABD
Participant Details

Original Note:

I support the proposed note and am replying to the comment about why NNN. If the bill states "gender transition procedures" and the article, and the tweet, use "gender affirming care" these are two different things. There is "gender affirming care" that is not banned.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653433525075423232
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ADD6D84E1F57E6163E655F2B417E4696E606ADB54DD1EDE679CED0D4F3222ABD
  • createdAtMillis - 1683070292978
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1653433525075423232ADD6D84E1F57E6163E655F2B417E4696E606ADB54DD1EDE679CED0D4F3222ABD