Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-02 18:32:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F4AD317BFE11BCC8ADF18882788849E230ADC87A974A9A328B7D1DAEEA49900
Participant Details

Original Note:

I support the proposed note and am replying to the comment about why NNN. If the bill states "gender transition procedures" and the article, and the tweet, use "gender affirming care" these are two different things. There is "gender affirming care" that is not banned.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653433525075423232
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F4AD317BFE11BCC8ADF18882788849E230ADC87A974A9A328B7D1DAEEA49900
  • createdAtMillis - 1683052367795
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16534335250754232320F4AD317BFE11BCC8ADF18882788849E230ADC87A974A9A328B7D1DAEEA49900