Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-03 12:52:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C0B98539DB06B4C51B140AF35436A5F70833CE50175EAB45C8C665AB3F6EAEF2
Participant Details

Original Note:

The account presents no evidence to that claim, except for their "loss of audience" which they neither clarify nor provide data to validate. Furthermore, Twitter's spokesperson directly addresses claim here: https://twitter.com/ellagirwin/status/1653413875935526912?s=20

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653415998374985728
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C0B98539DB06B4C51B140AF35436A5F70833CE50175EAB45C8C665AB3F6EAEF2
  • createdAtMillis - 1683118359528
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1653415998374985728C0B98539DB06B4C51B140AF35436A5F70833CE50175EAB45C8C665AB3F6EAEF2