Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-02 14:01:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B05E5A9FEAD2BBD12C27CCE2AF5EC06458B98D232AA85096BCC6FF412C1BEF6A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note doesn't add any further context to the tweet and seems only to have been added in an effort to be ineffectually argumentative. Furthermore, the note seems to excuse the practice of lobotomy simply to challenge the tweet.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653398319031537664
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B05E5A9FEAD2BBD12C27CCE2AF5EC06458B98D232AA85096BCC6FF412C1BEF6A
  • createdAtMillis - 1683036098339
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1653398319031537664B05E5A9FEAD2BBD12C27CCE2AF5EC06458B98D232AA85096BCC6FF412C1BEF6A