Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-03 00:46:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 79CAD4A406EA8E36CF56A0EAB46B9781B51B4F0906163E9FE60F6C47741CEEF4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note doesn't add any further context to the tweet and seems only to have been added in an effort to be ineffectually argumentative. Furthermore, the note seems to excuse the practice of lobotomy simply to challenge the tweet.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1653398319031537664
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 79CAD4A406EA8E36CF56A0EAB46B9781B51B4F0906163E9FE60F6C47741CEEF4
  • createdAtMillis - 1683074776433
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165339831903153766479CAD4A406EA8E36CF56A0EAB46B9781B51B4F0906163E9FE60F6C47741CEEF4