Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-01 02:15:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2A8BCAD0E8F5F11FA4BA28BBF4A58D16A1B6F839A6171EA07BB63529CF68892F
Participant Details

Original Note:

There might be a valid critique to make but the current note isn't it. It's an unpublished and non peer reviewed online pre-print by an author who does not appear to be an IQ specialist. It is not a reliable source. psyarxiv.com/26vfb/ https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/aboutus/people/sear.rebecca

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1652755204608262144
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2A8BCAD0E8F5F11FA4BA28BBF4A58D16A1B6F839A6171EA07BB63529CF68892F
  • createdAtMillis - 1682907315358
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16527552046082621442A8BCAD0E8F5F11FA4BA28BBF4A58D16A1B6F839A6171EA07BB63529CF68892F