Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-01 01:15:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 78AD503BD053AAD6EBAC3746EA58B4A59B488957DD5769AFD7196037F29E8398
Participant Details

Original Note:

Not misleading. Post political points or quibbles with methodology in replies, not in a Community Note. CN is not the place to debate or argue whether 37/22% blue/red sampling is 'skewed' or 'proportionate' or score quick dunks; please keep to the Community Note guidelines.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1652732876574564354
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 78AD503BD053AAD6EBAC3746EA58B4A59B488957DD5769AFD7196037F29E8398
  • createdAtMillis - 1682903743925
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165273287657456435478AD503BD053AAD6EBAC3746EA58B4A59B488957DD5769AFD7196037F29E8398