Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-02 22:12:46 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 737D9335AE3F5E4CB0BFA7D364702C6328D63C54F5AA6B89B9D61FEDC3C14DE5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The data in the tweet are unsourced and extremely dubious. Attempts to produce "national IQ" rankings are pseudoscience. As this paper shows, 'National IQ’ datasets do not provide accurate, unbiased or comparable measures of cognitive ability. https://psyarxiv.com/26vfb/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1652393152236404739
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 737D9335AE3F5E4CB0BFA7D364702C6328D63C54F5AA6B89B9D61FEDC3C14DE5
  • createdAtMillis - 1683065566755
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1652393152236404739737D9335AE3F5E4CB0BFA7D364702C6328D63C54F5AA6B89B9D61FEDC3C14DE5