Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-28 23:37:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9221C06F8F3B11123E0A93E42B9EA2D2FFFD0D63297D07884F5B2EC98943F248
Participant Details

Original Note:

The key issue as enunciated in the article is that at least one of these law firms where placement happened had business before the court. This point is ignored in the proposed comments. The tweet is factually correct. https://www.businessinsider.com/jane-roberts-chief-justice-wife-10-million-commissions-2023-4

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1652055713559252994
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9221C06F8F3B11123E0A93E42B9EA2D2FFFD0D63297D07884F5B2EC98943F248
  • createdAtMillis - 1682725049812
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16520557135592529949221C06F8F3B11123E0A93E42B9EA2D2FFFD0D63297D07884F5B2EC98943F248