Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-29 00:19:01 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5F83EACF95CADC748F26E0C4EF633A821389A756C7474F3A50C21CF4622E6C49
Participant Details

Original Note:

The key issue as enunciated in the article is that at least one of these law firms where placement happened had business before the court. This point is ignored in the proposed comments. The tweet is factually correct. https://www.businessinsider.com/jane-roberts-chief-justice-wife-10-million-commissions-2023-4

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1652055713559252994
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5F83EACF95CADC748F26E0C4EF633A821389A756C7474F3A50C21CF4622E6C49
  • createdAtMillis - 1682727541411
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16520557135592529945F83EACF95CADC748F26E0C4EF633A821389A756C7474F3A50C21CF4622E6C49