Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-28 23:01:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5EDC2B8BBEA2C25FBA40E8849AF6DD751A4AE52F674E4E2311C09F82909AD4F8
Participant Details

Original Note:

The key issue as enunciated in the article is that at least one of these law firms where placement happened had business before the court. This point is ignored in the proposed comments. The tweet is factually correct. https://www.businessinsider.com/jane-roberts-chief-justice-wife-10-million-commissions-2023-4

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1652055713559252994
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5EDC2B8BBEA2C25FBA40E8849AF6DD751A4AE52F674E4E2311C09F82909AD4F8
  • createdAtMillis - 1682722892923
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16520557135592529945EDC2B8BBEA2C25FBA40E8849AF6DD751A4AE52F674E4E2311C09F82909AD4F8