Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-29 00:00:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 59F0A86DBF8DFBAFDEE04E4DCFCF5A1C4691D3EFB9635E15AD65D1AC987168E0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The key issue as enunciated in the article is that at least one of these law firms where placement happened had business before the court. This point is ignored in the proposed comments. The tweet is factually correct. https://www.businessinsider.com/jane-roberts-chief-justice-wife-10-million-commissions-2023-4

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1652055713559252994
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 59F0A86DBF8DFBAFDEE04E4DCFCF5A1C4691D3EFB9635E15AD65D1AC987168E0
  • createdAtMillis - 1682726423713
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165205571355925299459F0A86DBF8DFBAFDEE04E4DCFCF5A1C4691D3EFB9635E15AD65D1AC987168E0