Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-28 22:10:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 38D7CB1023F3C77F8B4B0B8C9AC9125DD0A328C055541E16BD34FCE97EAA1075
Participant Details

Original Note:

The key issue as enunciated in the article is that at least one of these law firms where placement happened had business before the court. This point is ignored in the proposed comments. The tweet is factually correct. https://www.businessinsider.com/jane-roberts-chief-justice-wife-10-million-commissions-2023-4

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1652055713559252994
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 38D7CB1023F3C77F8B4B0B8C9AC9125DD0A328C055541E16BD34FCE97EAA1075
  • createdAtMillis - 1682719858156
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165205571355925299438D7CB1023F3C77F8B4B0B8C9AC9125DD0A328C055541E16BD34FCE97EAA1075