Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-29 19:26:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F654BA35D2EED2FDD4A6F5947C52B4D3F5C2A8D10F0F0DB4DF08315E02DE322E
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the court case in question is certainly old, no new cases have been decided to make the decision on that case 'outdated' or 'misinformation'.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1651991550740791296
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F654BA35D2EED2FDD4A6F5947C52B4D3F5C2A8D10F0F0DB4DF08315E02DE322E
  • createdAtMillis - 1682796379662
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1651991550740791296F654BA35D2EED2FDD4A6F5947C52B4D3F5C2A8D10F0F0DB4DF08315E02DE322E