Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-30 11:18:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4A393247D22E3C0E876C0A704A66B99A9953B87BA245F5FA81CE3A2BAF58277C
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the court case in question is certainly old, no new cases have been decided to make the decision on that case 'outdated' or 'misinformation'.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1651991550740791296
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4A393247D22E3C0E876C0A704A66B99A9953B87BA245F5FA81CE3A2BAF58277C
  • createdAtMillis - 1682853496271
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16519915507407912964A393247D22E3C0E876C0A704A66B99A9953B87BA245F5FA81CE3A2BAF58277C