Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-01 07:38:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3C106446EB1BEDC54D5991F19C85C6A8AE3701756744DC83570F78B5E8EB08E6
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the court case in question is certainly old, no new cases have been decided to make the decision on that case 'outdated' or 'misinformation'.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1651991550740791296
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3C106446EB1BEDC54D5991F19C85C6A8AE3701756744DC83570F78B5E8EB08E6
  • createdAtMillis - 1682926695873
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16519915507407912963C106446EB1BEDC54D5991F19C85C6A8AE3701756744DC83570F78B5E8EB08E6