Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-30 20:39:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1D2E1E7436A1765643A7D065584826C1F604E4E9B0AA54B0B2C74E204A22A3D4
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the court case in question is certainly old, no new cases have been decided to make the decision on that case 'outdated' or 'misinformation'.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1651991550740791296
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1D2E1E7436A1765643A7D065584826C1F604E4E9B0AA54B0B2C74E204A22A3D4
  • createdAtMillis - 1682887152267
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16519915507407912961D2E1E7436A1765643A7D065584826C1F604E4E9B0AA54B0B2C74E204A22A3D4