Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-30 00:01:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0D0F43A8CFE0D1BF251B7D604272F57DFE7FC1B9E76A00193B34B076A2C698E9
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the court case in question is certainly old, no new cases have been decided to make the decision on that case 'outdated' or 'misinformation'.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1651991550740791296
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0D0F43A8CFE0D1BF251B7D604272F57DFE7FC1B9E76A00193B34B076A2C698E9
  • createdAtMillis - 1682812906789
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16519915507407912960D0F43A8CFE0D1BF251B7D604272F57DFE7FC1B9E76A00193B34B076A2C698E9