Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-28 15:26:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 015058E9BD62D6815805B87D4DC59D307D6942DE3AFF92A4C8618E74F876788F
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet and article are real https://twitter.com/theeconomist/status/1651745179500462081?s=46&t=4Jo4-8HBP7Ozw0gB_5KXaw

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1651970137950437376
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 015058E9BD62D6815805B87D4DC59D307D6942DE3AFF92A4C8618E74F876788F
  • createdAtMillis - 1682695591747
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1651970137950437376015058E9BD62D6815805B87D4DC59D307D6942DE3AFF92A4C8618E74F876788F