Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-28 15:41:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6A22492186AFAD9D6ED7AE33C72EC7C77883C140C56537CD25621C1CEC6DE42C
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is believed to be the link to the article where you can read it in its entirety. It should be noted however that “hate speech” doesn’t have a specified definition and is up to interpretation. What one considers to be hateful another may not. https://www.latimes.com/business/technology/story/2023-04-27/hate-speech-twitter-surged-since-elon-musk-takeover

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1651805459479707649
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 6A22492186AFAD9D6ED7AE33C72EC7C77883C140C56537CD25621C1CEC6DE42C
createdAtMillis - 1682696514347
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 16518054594797076496A22492186AFAD9D6ED7AE33C72EC7C77883C140C56537CD25621C1CEC6DE42C