Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-28 18:28:44 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5ABC9562DE122F431F9AC72E15676D5687C282F705FF11390133D6D61245FCEC
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is believed to be the link to the article where you can read it in its entirety. It should be noted however that “hate speech” doesn’t have a specified definition and is up to interpretation. What one considers to be hateful another may not. https://www.latimes.com/business/technology/story/2023-04-27/hate-speech-twitter-surged-since-elon-musk-takeover

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1651805459479707649
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 5ABC9562DE122F431F9AC72E15676D5687C282F705FF11390133D6D61245FCEC
createdAtMillis - 1682706524259
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 16518054594797076495ABC9562DE122F431F9AC72E15676D5687C282F705FF11390133D6D61245FCEC