Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-28 11:47:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1973E594D1FFD65E3AA6B5530EF9A3BBEF250685BB7B90B2A31490AE2E3090DB
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is believed to be the link to the article where you can read it in its entirety. It should be noted however that “hate speech” doesn’t have a specified definition and is up to interpretation. What one considers to be hateful another may not. https://www.latimes.com/business/technology/story/2023-04-27/hate-speech-twitter-surged-since-elon-musk-takeover

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1651805459479707649
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 1973E594D1FFD65E3AA6B5530EF9A3BBEF250685BB7B90B2A31490AE2E3090DB
createdAtMillis - 1682682429594
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 16518054594797076491973E594D1FFD65E3AA6B5530EF9A3BBEF250685BB7B90B2A31490AE2E3090DB