Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-27 19:11:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4BE9C0641BF30F8D1FF91F7752CFB5120F30D272B8F12FF3DD6C7F901EED2BC9
Participant Details

Original Note:

He’s not wrong, but no note needed. Tuckers own lawyers fought on the premise that Tuckers own show is not to be believed. https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020-9 “….given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statements he makes.”

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1651625062263398433
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4BE9C0641BF30F8D1FF91F7752CFB5120F30D272B8F12FF3DD6C7F901EED2BC9
  • createdAtMillis - 1682622668617
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16516250622633984334BE9C0641BF30F8D1FF91F7752CFB5120F30D272B8F12FF3DD6C7F901EED2BC9