Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-27 16:34:32 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 015058E9BD62D6815805B87D4DC59D307D6942DE3AFF92A4C8618E74F876788F
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no definition of "Assault-style firearms" according to Canadian law therefore the claim that they belong on the battlefield can not be verified. https://beta.ctvnews.ca/national/politics/2023/2/3/1_6258656.amp.html https://www.thestar.com/politics/2023/02/03/cp-newsalert-liberals-withdraw-controversial-amendment-to-guns-bill.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1651610967451529221
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 015058E9BD62D6815805B87D4DC59D307D6942DE3AFF92A4C8618E74F876788F
createdAtMillis - 1682613272513
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1651610967451529221015058E9BD62D6815805B87D4DC59D307D6942DE3AFF92A4C8618E74F876788F