Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-09 20:59:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4AF364E10C1ADB50FEE5F8F62F4968C3C53C8BF9E6EA162CDD707E2D0608A58F
Participant Details

Original Note:

No community notes are needed on this tweet. The tweet is a statement of opinion. Users of this platform are free to comment on the tweet itself which is a sufficient expression of one's own individual opinion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1651542638342840322
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4AF364E10C1ADB50FEE5F8F62F4968C3C53C8BF9E6EA162CDD707E2D0608A58F
  • createdAtMillis - 1683665986389
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16515426383428403224AF364E10C1ADB50FEE5F8F62F4968C3C53C8BF9E6EA162CDD707E2D0608A58F