Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-26 04:53:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E22ACFA7F5E65A85B8F927A2471ADE5FBA44DCE6A4D25C9B4DEF8F199AD4FEE2
Participant Details

Original Note:

POTENCIALMENTE ENGANOSO E SE BENEFICIA MAIS COM O CONTEXTO. O defensor do PL 2630 que trata da liberdade de expressão e opinião na Internet não sabe distinguir fato de opinião. Juridicamente, "fake news" é fato(!) sabidamente inverídico. Como é uma opinião, não há "fake news". https://www.redebrasilatual.com.br/politica/veja-perde-justica-materia-mentirosa/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1651076507786264576
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E22ACFA7F5E65A85B8F927A2471ADE5FBA44DCE6A4D25C9B4DEF8F199AD4FEE2
  • createdAtMillis - 1682484817149
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1651076507786264576E22ACFA7F5E65A85B8F927A2471ADE5FBA44DCE6A4D25C9B4DEF8F199AD4FEE2