Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-02 10:37:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F5F6296A548B535CFF2CFAEA055CB2A3C3C8DF7167908242B1DCEACED98F9DC8
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is not a "confirmed fact", there's little to no evidence the females retain male DNA, the tweet contains a factual error and presents an unverified allegation. https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/male-dna-living-forever-in-women-after-sex-is-short-on-evidence/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1651025459507781632
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F5F6296A548B535CFF2CFAEA055CB2A3C3C8DF7167908242B1DCEACED98F9DC8
  • createdAtMillis - 1683023858366
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1651025459507781632F5F6296A548B535CFF2CFAEA055CB2A3C3C8DF7167908242B1DCEACED98F9DC8