Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-28 17:27:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A6BFE78A45FD9EDE77E4989E9C954A7275A576C51301725DE745FD157B5550C2
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is not a "confirmed fact", there's little to no evidence the females retain male DNA, the tweet contains a factual error and presents an unverified allegation. https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/male-dna-living-forever-in-women-after-sex-is-short-on-evidence/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1651025459507781632
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A6BFE78A45FD9EDE77E4989E9C954A7275A576C51301725DE745FD157B5550C2
  • createdAtMillis - 1682702865153
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1651025459507781632A6BFE78A45FD9EDE77E4989E9C954A7275A576C51301725DE745FD157B5550C2