Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-26 01:08:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 22C17C30AFA6F619D2A0FA21832D408174ED9DE8B2302DEB2719627C8B7448BA
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is not a "confirmed fact", there's little to no evidence the females retain male DNA, the tweet contains a factual error and presents an unverified allegation. https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/male-dna-living-forever-in-women-after-sex-is-short-on-evidence/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1651025459507781632
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 22C17C30AFA6F619D2A0FA21832D408174ED9DE8B2302DEB2719627C8B7448BA
  • createdAtMillis - 1682471294136
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165102545950778163222C17C30AFA6F619D2A0FA21832D408174ED9DE8B2302DEB2719627C8B7448BA