Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-27 06:04:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FABEE342DECC60C484C0982BB951F24D6B5B9CDF602DEF92213B3D906C4A0D68
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is not misleading; it is merely a statement of the bands' opinion and their plans to not associate with an individual. Discussion/debate over why belongs in the replies, not the Community Notes. No Note Needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1651000374541578240
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FABEE342DECC60C484C0982BB951F24D6B5B9CDF602DEF92213B3D906C4A0D68
  • createdAtMillis - 1682575482931
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1651000374541578240FABEE342DECC60C484C0982BB951F24D6B5B9CDF602DEF92213B3D906C4A0D68