Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-02 22:19:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00A5C9EBF7FD59793C88C763D13258E21997057AAF27F6160F1A2E9B4892E53D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Suggested note is an Op-Ed column; one attorney (even a gov't attorney)'s opinion on the potential legality of not-as-of-yet extant laws or propositions are not fact nor sufficient to render this tweet misleading or counterfactual. Best place for that context is in replies. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650995980051918852
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00A5C9EBF7FD59793C88C763D13258E21997057AAF27F6160F1A2E9B4892E53D
  • createdAtMillis - 1683065999761
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165099598005191885200A5C9EBF7FD59793C88C763D13258E21997057AAF27F6160F1A2E9B4892E53D