Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-25 23:01:26 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2CD9506359C9C5E07C234DE6F81526A6FF52DE4960F613BA147D13C2F1A762F1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Suggested note is an Op-Ed column; one attorney (even a gov't attorney)'s opinion on the potential legality of not-as-of-yet extant laws or propositions are not fact nor sufficient to render this tweet misleading or counterfactual. Best place for that context is in replies. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650995779459330048
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2CD9506359C9C5E07C234DE6F81526A6FF52DE4960F613BA147D13C2F1A762F1
  • createdAtMillis - 1682463686293
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16509957794593300482CD9506359C9C5E07C234DE6F81526A6FF52DE4960F613BA147D13C2F1A762F1