Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-25 23:59:26 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F3D5922702F85D22953D143F7B9C16CF40868CC8C920BADF8C4E204C1FEF6636
Participant Details

Original Note:

Suggested note is an Op-Ed column; one attorney (even a gov't attorney)'s opinion on the potential legality of not-as-of-yet extant laws or propositions are not fact nor sufficient to render this tweet misleading or counterfactual. Best place for that context is in replies. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650995583803437061
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F3D5922702F85D22953D143F7B9C16CF40868CC8C920BADF8C4E204C1FEF6636
  • createdAtMillis - 1682467166221
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1650995583803437061F3D5922702F85D22953D143F7B9C16CF40868CC8C920BADF8C4E204C1FEF6636