Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-25 23:41:10 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A8F0DE6D6FCF5540C9EBBE6B476B41D75CFB863585D0BEFBF26C51C91BC5F06B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Suggested note is an Op-Ed column; one attorney (even a gov't attorney)'s opinion on the potential legality of not-as-of-yet extant laws or propositions are not fact nor sufficient to render this tweet misleading or counterfactual. Best place for that context is in replies. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1650995583803437061
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A8F0DE6D6FCF5540C9EBBE6B476B41D75CFB863585D0BEFBF26C51C91BC5F06B
  • createdAtMillis - 1682466070504
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1650995583803437061A8F0DE6D6FCF5540C9EBBE6B476B41D75CFB863585D0BEFBF26C51C91BC5F06B